unwrite for marketing teams
Brand voice that holds across the team, with sourcing you can defend when brand or legal asks where a claim came from.
Start writing freeOne free credit. No card required.
Save the brand's voice and draft against it every time, not against a generic "professional" tone.
Citations come only from sources it can verify, and the audit flags anything unsupported. When legal asks for the source, there is one.
An editorial review that flags what to fix, plus an independent Second read on Pro and Team, makes "good enough to publish" a check, not a feeling.
The audit clears the mechanical and tell-level issues first, so your editors spend review time on substance.
On the Teams plan, share a workspace so the whole team can read the pieces filed in it, and share the brand's saved voices across every user, up to six, so the register holds across writers. Each writer still owns their own draft.
Review, verify, and finish your piece with every edit under your control.
Hover any marker to explore the editor.
If a text sits unanswered for an hour and your whole body tenses, if a mild comment loops in your head for days, if a small dismissal lands like a physical blow, you are not the problem. For many autistic and ADHD adults, that reaction has a name: rejection sensitive dysphoria.
The difference is real, measurable, and not a defect. Brain imaging consistently shows variation between neurodivergent and neurotypical brains, according to TherapyExplained. In ADHD brains, differences in dopamine and norepinephrine signaling reshape the networks that handle attention and executive function.
Editorial Review
3 flags · 6 clean⚑Citations: “studies show” has no source
Fix: cite a verified source, or cut the claim. unwrite can research and verify one for you.
⚑AI phrasing: “not just a trend, it’s a transformation”
Fix: a stock AI construction. State the point directly, once.
Clear the flags, then send it for an independent Second read on Pro that marks what it would cut.
Every piece ships with an Editorial Review that flags exactly what to fix, and, on Pro, an independent Second read.
What ships is what came back clean.
Try it on a real pieceComparing tools? See unwrite vs Jasper, Copy.ai, ChatGPT, Claude.