Writing assistant · $12–30/mo
Grammarly checks writing everywhere you type. unwrite drafts to a proprietary editorial engine and audits the result.
Try a piece free. No card required.
| What matters | unwrite | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Writes in your voice from a sample | ✓ | ~ |
| Cites only sources it can verify, yours or researched | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI writing tropes stripped out by design | ✓ | ✕ |
| Type-aware structure for every format | ✓ | ✕ |
| Editorial review that flags what to fix, on every piece | ✓ | ✕ |
| Independent Second read (Pro and Team) | ✓ | ~ |
| Continuity read for whole books (Pro and Team) | ✓ | ✕ |
| Integrity stance (not detection-evasion) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Researches missing sources, then checks citations against their sources | ✓ | ✕ |
| Guided input, no prompt-craft required | ✓ | ✕ |
| A workspace per client, with folders inside | ✓ | ✕ |
✓ yes · ~ partial · ✕ no. Competitor details last verified July 2026; vendors change, so check each for the latest.
Grammarly's job is checking whatever you typed, wherever you typed it. Checking isn't drafting. unwrite starts earlier: it writes the piece in your voice to an editorial standard, then audits the result and hands you the verdict.
Grammarly checks what you wrote. unwrite drafts to a standard and proves it's clean.
Start writing freeTry a piece free. No card required.
Editorial Review
3 flags · 6 clean⚑Citations: “studies show” has no source
Fix: cite a verified source, or cut the claim. unwrite can research and verify one for you.
⚑AI phrasing: “not just a trend, it’s a transformation”
Fix: a stock AI construction. State the point directly, once.
Clear the flags, then send it for an independent Second read on Pro that marks what it would cut.
More comparisons: vs Jasper, vs Copy.ai, vs ChatGPT, vs Claude, vs Writer.
Or see unwrite for ghostwriters, content agencies, marketing teams, grant writers, pr and comms teams, founders, copywriters, bloggers, newsletter writers.