unwrite for grant writers
Draft fast, but cite only sources it can verify, flag what isn't supported, and keep it disclosure-ready.
Start writing freeOne free credit. No card required.
It cites only sources it can verify, whether yours or ones it researches and checks, and when a claim has no support the draft flags the gap instead of inventing a number.
Source check runs claim by claim (up to 200 per piece), matching each citation back to the source it came from, so each reference resolves to real material you can hand a funder.
A clear, auditable process you can describe honestly to a funder.
The audit front-loads the verification you'd otherwise do line by line.
Review, verify, and finish your piece with every edit under your control.
Hover any marker to explore the editor.
If a text sits unanswered for an hour and your whole body tenses, if a mild comment loops in your head for days, if a small dismissal lands like a physical blow, you are not the problem. For many autistic and ADHD adults, that reaction has a name: rejection sensitive dysphoria.
The difference is real, measurable, and not a defect. Brain imaging consistently shows variation between neurodivergent and neurotypical brains, according to TherapyExplained. In ADHD brains, differences in dopamine and norepinephrine signaling reshape the networks that handle attention and executive function.
Editorial Review
3 flags · 6 clean⚑Citations: “studies show” has no source
Fix: cite a verified source, or cut the claim. unwrite can research and verify one for you.
⚑AI phrasing: “not just a trend, it’s a transformation”
Fix: a stock AI construction. State the point directly, once.
Clear the flags, then send it for an independent Second read on Pro that marks what it would cut.
Every piece ships with an Editorial Review that flags exactly what to fix, and, on Pro, an independent Second read.
What ships is what came back clean.
Try it on a real pieceComparing tools? See unwrite vs Jasper, Copy.ai, ChatGPT, Claude.